AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1837 vs 935
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 338
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13016 vs 5635
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2156 vs 1935
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2475 vs 2380
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2156 vs 1935
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2475 vs 2380
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 57.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 704 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,830 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1837 vs 935
PassMark - G2D Mark 490 vs 338
Geekbench - OpenCL 13016 vs 5635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2156 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2475 vs 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2156 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2475 vs 2380

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1837
935
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
490
338
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
13016
5635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2156
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2156
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3354
Name AMD Radeon Vega 11 AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1837 935
PassMark - G2D Mark 490 338
Geekbench - OpenCL 13016 5635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 371.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 248.838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2156 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2475 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2156 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2475 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 11 AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Owl Oland
Launch date 13 February 2018 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 894 895
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 780 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 730 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,830 gflops 599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 704 384
Texture fill rate 57.2 GTexel / s 18.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None

Memory

Memory type System Shared GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5