AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1852 vs 935
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 338
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13313 vs 5635
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2156 vs 1935
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2475 vs 2380
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2156 vs 1935
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2475 vs 2380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 704 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1852 vs 935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 338 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13313 vs 5635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 vs 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 vs 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 vs 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 vs 2380 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1852 | 935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 | 338 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13313 | 5635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Owl | Oland |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 897 | 899 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 704 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 11 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1250
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
