AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 230 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 1.84 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 148.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 6
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 128
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 30 August 2001 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 230 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 1.84 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 vs 6 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 6 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 3 | ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rage 7 |
| Code name | Owl | R200 |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 30 August 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1266 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 230 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | |
| Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 1.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 60 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.08 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 380 MHz | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 8.1 | |
| OpenGL | 1.4 | |
