AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and AMD Radeon R7 M260DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 940 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 890 vs 817
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 195
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1047
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1019
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 2165
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1047
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1019
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 2165
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 12 October 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 vs 817 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 vs 2165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 vs 2165 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 3960
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 3960 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 | 817 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3960 | 18010 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 2165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 2165 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Owl | Topaz |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 12 October 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1261 | 1263 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 940 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |