AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and ATI Radeon 9200 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Vega 3

ATI Radeon 9200 SE

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
296.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 3
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 129

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 February 2018 vs 1 March 2003
Core clock speed	300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 150 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 28 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	889 vs 3
PassMark - G2D Mark	303 vs 129

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 SE

66.7x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s

Texture fill rate	800 MTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

889

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

303

129

Name	AMD Radeon Vega 3	ATI Radeon 9200 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark	889	3
PassMark - G2D Mark	303	129
Geekbench - OpenCL	3963
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	183.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.75
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	60.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3174
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	418

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Vega 3	ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Rage 7
Code name	Owl	RV280
Launch date	13 February 2018	1 March 2003
Place in performance rating	1267	1265
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Pipelines	192
Texture fill rate	12 GTexel / s	800 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	28 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	36 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	AGP 8x
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR
Maximum RAM amount		64 MB
Memory bandwidth		2.656 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		332 MHz
API support
DirectX		8.1
OpenGL		1.4