AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs ATI Radeon 9600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and ATI Radeon 9600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 35.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 25
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 150
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 1 October 2003 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 vs 25 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 150 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9600
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 324 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 324 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | ATI Radeon 9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 25 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | ATI Radeon 9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rage 8 |
Code name | Owl | RV350 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1133 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 324 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 76 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.05 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 378 MHz | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.0 |