AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 7 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 7
- 2.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 896 MB
Pipelines | 448 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 896 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 7
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1262 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1215 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Renoir | GT200 |
Launch date | Q1'2020 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1410 | 1407 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Price now | $95.38 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 36.9 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Number of simultaneous displays | 3 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 896 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin |