AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD Radeon R5 M430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 649
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 13.812
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 176.928 vs 144.604
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 0.981
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 18.55
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 65.872
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1087
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1157
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2212
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1087
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1157
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2212
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 15 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 vs 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 vs 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 vs 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 vs 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2212 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 649 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2212 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Raven | Exo |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 931 | 1182 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |