AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1713
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 333
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 12.449
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.295
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 24.566
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 28.025

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 176.928
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2408
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 3170
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2408
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 3170
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2148 vs 862

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1894 1713
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.039 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	176.928 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.666 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.603 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.437 28.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	862 2148

Compare specifications (specs)