AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1579
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 25.891
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 132.07
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1514
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2433
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1514
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2433
- Around 22% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 862 vs 705
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 13 February 2018 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 1579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 25.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 vs 132.07 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 2433 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 vs 705 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 355
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 365.4 vs 176.928
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 vs 1.666
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 vs 27.603
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3352
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3352
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 vs 176.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 vs 1.666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 vs 27.603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1579 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 25.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 365.4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 2.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 37.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 132.07 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 6729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 6729 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Raven | Owl |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 13 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 931 | 932 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 4,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |