AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1745
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 307
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 15.053
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 52.899

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Around 99% higher core clock speed: 598 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 176.928
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.666
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.603
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 2408
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3170
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 2408
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3170
• 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2062 vs 862

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1894 1745
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.039 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	176.928 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.666 1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.603 35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.437 52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	862 2062

Compare specifications (specs)