AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 312
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 22.12
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 59.007

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1925 vs 1894
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 vs 176.928
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.003 vs 1.666
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.983 vs 27.603
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2649 vs 2408
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3170
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2649 vs 2408
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3170

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1894 1925
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.039 22.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	176.928 664.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.666 2.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.603 33.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.437 59.007
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3347

Compare specifications (specs)