AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs ATI FirePro V4800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

ATI FirePro V4800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 69 Watt
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1204
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 5.886
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 0.529
Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 14.184
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 56.777
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1512
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2211
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3326
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1512
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2211
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3326

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2018 vs 26 April 2010
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 69 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894 vs 1204
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039 vs 5.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666 vs 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603 vs 14.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437 vs 56.777
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408 vs 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170 vs 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408 vs 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170 vs 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3326

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800

2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 355
Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 321.782 vs 176.928

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	456 vs 355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	321.782 vs 176.928

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1894

1204

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

355

456

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.039

5.886

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

176.928

321.782

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.666

0.529

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.603

14.184

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

135.437

56.777

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

1512

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

2211

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3326

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

1512

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

2211

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3326

Name	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	ATI FirePro V4800
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894	1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	355	456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039	5.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	176.928	321.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666	0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603	14.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437	56.777
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408	1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170	2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408	1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170	2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3326
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	862
Geekbench - OpenCL		1670

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	ATI FirePro V4800
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Raven	Redwood
Launch date	23 April 2018	26 April 2010
Place in performance rating	973	1092
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$189
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	775 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	69 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	627 million
Floating-point performance		620.0 gflops
Pipelines		400
Texture fill rate		15.5 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		168 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		3600 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5