AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 12 November 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 26.039
- 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 176.928
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 1.666
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 27.603
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 135.437
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 vs 26.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 vs 176.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 vs 1.666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 vs 27.603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 vs 135.437 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 39.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 1427.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 4.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 64.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 179.044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Raven | GK110 |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 973 | 976 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2496 | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |