AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 41 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 22.112
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.427
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 15.363
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 99.125
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3329
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3329
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 862 vs 702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 22 July 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 vs 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 vs 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 vs 702 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2233 vs 1894
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 355
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 176.928
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2408
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2408
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2233 vs 1894 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 vs 176.928 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2408 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 2233 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | 702 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Raven | GM107 |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 973 | 975 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 160 mm | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |