AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1877
Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 13.806
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.535
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 38.664
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1435
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3300
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1435
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3300

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2018 vs 22 April 2013
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894 vs 1877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039 vs 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666 vs 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603 vs 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437 vs 38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408 vs 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408 vs 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3300

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

2.7x more core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 355
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 vs 176.928
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 3170
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 3170

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	824 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	430 vs 355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	546.51 vs 176.928
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3531 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3531 vs 3170

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1894

1877

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

355

430

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.039

13.806

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

176.928

546.51

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.666

1.535

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.603

27.524

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

135.437

38.664

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

1435

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

3531

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3300

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

1435

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

3531

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3300

Name	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894	1877
PassMark - G2D Mark	355	430
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039	13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	176.928	546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666	1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603	27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437	38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408	1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170	3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408	1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170	3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3300
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	862
Geekbench - OpenCL		5235

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Kepler
Code name	Raven	GK106
Launch date	23 April 2018	22 April 2013
Place in performance rating	973	964
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	2,540 million
Floating-point performance		949.2 gflops
Pipelines		576
Texture fill rate		39.55 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		147 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		64 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		4000 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5