AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 333
• Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8803 vs 4928
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 vs 12.449
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 vs 1.295
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 vs 24.566
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 vs 28.025
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3344
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1713 vs 1579
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 365.4
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 1514
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2433
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 1514
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2433
• 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2148 vs 705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1579 1713
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	408 333
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8803 4928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.891 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	365.4 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.104 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.17 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	132.07 28.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	705 2148

Compare specifications (specs)