AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 312
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8803 vs 6362
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 vs 22.12
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 vs 2.003
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 vs 33.983
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 vs 59.007
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3347
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3347

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1925 vs 1579
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 vs 365.4
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2649 vs 1514
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2433
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2649 vs 1514
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2433

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1579 1925
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	408 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8803 6362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.891 22.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	365.4 664.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.104 2.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.17 33.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	132.07 59.007
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3347

Compare specifications (specs)