AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1219 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 576 vs 512
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 12 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1219 MHz |
Pipelines | 576 vs 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 vs 389 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1850 vs 1588
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10245 vs 9577
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2591
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2591
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1856
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1856
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2482
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2482
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1850 vs 1588 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10245 vs 9577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1588 | 1850 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9577 | 10245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Lexa |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 12 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 818 | 820 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 2,200 million |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |