AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 215
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9706 vs 9425
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 17 May 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 vs 215 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 vs 9425 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2278 vs 1591
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2591
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2591
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1856
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1856
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2482
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2482
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 vs 1591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 215 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 2278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 | 9425 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3356 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Pascal |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GP108 |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 812 | 905 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 1,800 million |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |