AMD Wii U GPU vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Comparative analysis of AMD Wii U GPU and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Wii U GPU

  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c

  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 16.7x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
  • 7.8x more pipelines: 2496 vs 320
  • 10x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
  • 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 146.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2496 vs 320
Floating-point performance 3,524 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Wii U GPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Name AMD Wii U GPU NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Geekbench - OpenCL 15597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1427.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 179.044

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Wii U GPU NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Kepler
Code name Latte GK110
Launch date 18 November 2012 12 November 2012
Place in performance rating not rated 1016
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,199

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 352.0 gflops 3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 2496
Texture fill rate 8.8 GTexel / s 146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 880 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX N / A 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL N / A 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 5200 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare AMD Wii U GPU with others

AMD Wii U GPU AMD
Wii U GPU
vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c NVIDIA
Tesla K20c
AMD Wii U GPU AMD
Wii U GPU
vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive AMD
FirePro S10000 Passive
AMD Wii U GPU AMD
Wii U GPU
vs AMD FirePro S10000 AMD
FirePro S10000