ATI FireMV 2200 vs ATI Radeon X600 XT
Comparative analysis of ATI FireMV 2200 and ATI Radeon X600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 110 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 January 2006 vs 1 September 2004 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm vs 130 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 vs 258 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600 XT
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 324 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 2 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 740 MHz vs 392 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 92 vs 36
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 324 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 740 MHz vs 392 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 92 vs 36 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FireMV 2200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | ATI FireMV 2200 | ATI Radeon X600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | 258 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 36 | 92 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI FireMV 2200 | ATI Radeon X600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Rage 9 | Rage 9 |
| Code name | RV370 | RV380 |
| Launch date | 1 January 2006 | 1 September 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | 695 | 696 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 324 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 130 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.296 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 107 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.136 GB / s | 11.84 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 392 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
