ATI FirePro M7820 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro M7820 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7820
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 6.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 128
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 1 February 2010 |
Pipelines | 800 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro M7820
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Name | ATI FirePro M7820 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.956 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.944 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2709 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.902 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro M7820 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Broadway | G92 |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 1 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1290 | 1291 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Gigaflops | 576 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |