NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs ATI FirePro M7820
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI FirePro M7820 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 4.956
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.869
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 vs 1 May 2010 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.229 vs 4.956 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 vs 0.869 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7820
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 800 vs 192
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 62 Watt
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15792 vs 3903
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.944 vs 258.26
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.146 vs 13.688
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.902 vs 19.02
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2709 vs 1682
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2709 vs 1682
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15792 vs 3903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.944 vs 258.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.146 vs 13.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.902 vs 19.02 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2709 vs 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2709 vs 1682 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7820
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | ATI FirePro M7820 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 946 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3903 | 15792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.229 | 4.956 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | 600.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | 0.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | 21.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 | 103.902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1682 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | ATI FirePro M7820 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF106 | Broadway |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 | 1 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1290 | 1291 |
Price now | $87.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |