ATI FirePro V7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V7800 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 23.8x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s
- 180x more pipelines: 1440 vs 8
- 96.9x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 29x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 70
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 168
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 April 2010 vs 15 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 vs 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 168 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V7800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI FirePro V7800 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 | 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 63 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro V7800 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Cypress | G98 |
Launch date | 26 April 2010 | 15 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $759 | |
Place in performance rating | 1010 | 1011 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1440 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 2.12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-I |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |