ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 17 Watt
Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 9 May 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 17 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 380 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 87 vs 66
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 vs 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 174 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 | 87 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RS880 | G86 |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1008 | 1010 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 380 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 181 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 7.0 |