NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 654 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 24.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1641 vs 66
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 335 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 654 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1641 vs 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 vs 174 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1641 | 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4221 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.45 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 403.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 24.266 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2527 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2527 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RS880 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 1 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | |
Place in performance rating | 1006 | 1008 |
Price now | $155 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 9 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 |