ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 20.8 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec
- 10x more pipelines: 640 vs 64
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 832.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
Texture fill rate | 20.8 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 650 MHz
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3221 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | M97 | G94 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 775 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 GTexel / s | 19 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 826 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
Powerplay | ||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |