NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 9.6x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 768 vs 80
- 11.5x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2014 vs 200
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 270
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 1844
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 1844
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 5 May 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2014 vs 200 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 vs 270 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 1844 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2014 | 200 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 | 270 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7252 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.935 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 1844 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK106 | M92 |
| Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 5 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1005 | 1007 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 115.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s | 5.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
