ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.6x more pipelines: 400 vs 112
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 360.0 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 89
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 15 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 400 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 89 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 444
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 444 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 444 | 454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 89 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3776 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Madison | G92 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 15 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1362 | 1364 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $328.50 | |
Price now | $328.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.78 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 420 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |