ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 147 vs 53
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3258
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3258
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 400 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 vs 53 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3258 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 824 vs 449
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 3776
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 824 vs 449 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 3776 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 449 | 824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 | 53 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3258 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3776 | 13337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Madison | GT200B |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1360 | 1361 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |