ATI Radeon HD 4225 vs ATI FirePro V3800
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4225 and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 380 MHz
- 10x more pipelines: 400 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 380 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 40 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4225
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 4225 | ATI FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 321 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 153.019 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.314 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.552 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1572 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2958 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1572 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 4225 | ATI FirePro V3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RV6xx | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | RS880M | Redwood |
| Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 26 April 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1411 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 380 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 627 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Shared memory | yes | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| HDCP support | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
