ATI Radeon HD 4225 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4225 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4225
- 10x more pipelines: 40 vs 4
Pipelines | 40 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 55 nm
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 55 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4225
GPU 2: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4225 | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4225 | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RV6xx | PowerVR SGX5 |
Code name | RS880M | GMA 600 |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 1 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1575 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 380 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 45 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 4 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Shared memory | yes | yes |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |