ATI Radeon HD 4225 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4225 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4225

  • 10x more pipelines: 40 vs 4
Pipelines 40 vs 4

Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 380 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 55 nm
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 380 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 55 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4225
GPU 2: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Name ATI Radeon HD 4225 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
PassMark - G3D Mark 6
PassMark - G2D Mark 58

Compare specifications (specs)

ATI Radeon HD 4225 Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Essentials

Architecture RV6xx PowerVR SGX5
Code name RS880M GMA 600
Launch date 1 May 2010 1 May 2010
Place in performance rating not rated 1575
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 380 MHz 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 45 nm
Pipelines 40 4

API support

DirectX 10.1 9.0c

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Shared memory yes yes

Technologies

HDCP support
PCI-E 2.0

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare ATI Radeon HD 4225 with others

ATI Radeon HD 4225 ATI
Radeon HD 4225
vs ATI FirePro V3800 ATI
FirePro V3800
ATI Radeon HD 4225 ATI
Radeon HD 4225
vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 Intel
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
ATI Radeon HD 4225 ATI
Radeon HD 4225
vs ATI Radeon HD 4270 ATI
Radeon HD 4270