ATI Radeon HD 4870 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4870 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 30 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- 7.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 112
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1380 vs 378
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3285
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 June 2008 vs 8 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1380 vs 378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 78 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 84 vs 44
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 78 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 84 vs 44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4870
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4870 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1380 | 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 84 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4870 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV770 | G92 |
Launch date | 25 June 2008 | 8 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 1328 | 1329 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $99.02 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 30 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 78 Watt |
Transistor count | 956 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |