NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs ATI Radeon HD 4870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and ATI Radeon HD 4870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 43
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 25 June 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 6.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 128
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1386 vs 452
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3315
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3315
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 352.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1386 vs 452 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3315 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | ATI Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 452 | 1386 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 43 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | ATI Radeon HD 4870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | G92 | RV770 |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 25 June 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 1328 | 1329 |
| Price now | $925 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
