ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4890 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4890
- 6.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 128
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 374.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1533 vs 576
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1876
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1876
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1533 vs 576 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 34.0 GTexel / s
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4890
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4890 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1533 | 576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4890 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV790 | G92 |
Launch date | 2 April 2009 | 3 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 1261 | 1262 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1463 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops | 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 959 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-IV |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 124.8 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3900 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |