NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs ATI Radeon HD 4890
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and ATI Radeon HD 4890 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
| Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 2 April 2009 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4890
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 8.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 96
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 288 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 3900 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1539 vs 415
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 66 vs 41
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3259
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 288 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 3900 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1539 vs 415 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 vs 41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3259 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4890
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | ATI Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 415 | 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 66 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | ATI Radeon HD 4890 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | G92 | RV790 |
| Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 2 April 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1257 | 1258 |
| Price now | $49.95 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 959 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 124.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
