ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
- 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 286
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1378 vs 751
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1160 vs 442
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1570
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1160 vs 442
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1570
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 400 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1378 vs 751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 vs 442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 vs 442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1570 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 39 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 195
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 39 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 vs 195 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | 286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1378 | 751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | 442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | 442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Turks | GF108 |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1387 | 1388 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 3.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |