AMD Radeon R7 M270 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M270 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 520.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 767 vs 476
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 1377
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.826 vs 4.393
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1160
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 11 October 2011 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 520.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 767 vs 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6810 vs 1377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.826 vs 4.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 vs 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 vs 1160 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 153
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 527
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2081
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 527
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2081
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 vs 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 vs 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2081 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M270
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M270 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 767 | 476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6810 | 1377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.826 | 4.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 527 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2081 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 527 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2081 | 3360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M270 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Opal | Turks |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 11 October 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1387 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AMD Eyefinity |