ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X1700 FSC and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 587 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 44 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 800 MHz
Core clock speed | 587 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- 10.2x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Name | ATI Radeon X1700 FSC | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | R500 | Tesla |
Code name | RV535 | G92 |
Launch date | 5 November 2007 | 1 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1146 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 587 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 2.348 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 330 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.24 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |