ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X1700 FSC and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 44 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 587 MHz
- 14.3x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 2.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 587 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 2.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Name | ATI Radeon X1700 FSC | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 471 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | R500 | Tesla |
Code name | RV535 | G92 |
Launch date | 5 November 2007 | 29 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1380 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 587 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 2.348 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 330 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 112 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.24 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit |