Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 86 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 3 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- 56x more pipelines: 112 vs 2
- 126.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 379 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 112 vs 2 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 379 vs 3 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3 | 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Code name | Pineview | G92 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1450 | 1452 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Architecture | Tesla | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2 | 112 |
Transistor count | 123 Million | 754 million |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |