Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770
- 20x more texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- 66.7x more pipelines: 800 vs 12
- 66.7x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 vs 261
- 9.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 35
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 vs 1137
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 vs 1137
- 33.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 101
- 33.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 101
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 12 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1262 vs 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 vs 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 101 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 | 1262 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | 318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1137 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1137 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 101 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 101 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3802 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.69 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 6.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Sandy Bridge GT2 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1604 | 1117 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Price now | $76.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 20.4 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.7 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 995 million | 1,040 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 3000 with others
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 405
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9400M G
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5450
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6310
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
