Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 3000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 261 vs 98
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1137 vs 813
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1137 vs 813

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

• 8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 280 vs 35
• 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 699 vs 101
• 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 699 vs 101

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 3000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	261 98
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	35 280
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137 813
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137 813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101 699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101 699

Compare specifications (specs)