Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 235 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 130 nm
- 38.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 9
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 166
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 17 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 235 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 9 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 166 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT
- 223.8x more texture fill rate: 940 MTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 940 MTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 9 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 166 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | NV31 A1 |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 17 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1070 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 235 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 940 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | 80 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |