Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 20 vs 16
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 629 vs 345
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 191
• 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3230 vs 541
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 8.712
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 155.638
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.931
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 vs 7.36
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 vs 12.009
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 754
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1492
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2392
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 754
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1492
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	629 345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	315 191
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3230 541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 2392

Compare specifications (specs)