Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 5 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 20 versus 16
- Environ 49% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 50 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 629 versus 345
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 versus 191
- 6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3230 versus 541
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 8.712
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 155.638
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.931
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 7.36
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 versus 12.009
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 754
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 1492
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 2392
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 754
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 1492
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 20 versus 16 |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 629 versus 345 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 versus 191 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3230 versus 541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 versus 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 versus 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 400 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 629 | 345 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 191 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3230 | 541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 2392 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1354 | 1499 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 16 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GT
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3800
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8
