Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 20 vs 16
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 126
- 10.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 30
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2438
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 497
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 688
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 497
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 20 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 vs 2438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 45 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 12 October 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1359 | 1674 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
| Price now | $32.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
