Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 170 Watt
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 10.5x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 25.3x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3362 vs 988
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 1702
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2808
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3362 vs 988
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 1702
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3362 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3362 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 8 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1359 | 470 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
