Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 170 Watt
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 8 March 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 25.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,263.4 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3362 versus 988
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 2808
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3362 versus 988
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 2808
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3362 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3362 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 2808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 8 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 470 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.3 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
