Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 23.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 70.1
- 30.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 31.3
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 470 vs 43.2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 12 July 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 vs 70.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 vs 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 vs 43.2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 18
- 3x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3926 vs 1635
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1938 vs 956
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2550 vs 470
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 18 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3926 vs 1635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1938 vs 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2550 vs 470 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 505 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1325 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 95 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 | 3926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 | 70.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 | 1938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 | 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 2550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | 43.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 342.738 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.945 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.549 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 505 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 12 July 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1524 | 1526 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.26 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5016 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |